Risk Classification Engine
Before any documentation can begin, the risk tier must be established. The Risk Classification Engine guides users through a structured evaluation against Article 6 criteria and the Annex III high-risk use case categories. The classification sets the scope of every requirement that follows.
- →Guided wizard evaluating Article 6(1), 6(2), and Annex III categories in sequence
- →Produces a definitive risk tier: prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk, or minimal-risk
- →Versioned regulatory rules engine — updates without a code deployment when guidance changes
- →Seamless handoff from AI Regulatory Navigator pre-assessment with pre-populated classification fields
- →Re-classification triggers automated AISDP review and risk register updates
Guided Discovery Questionnaire
The central authoring experience of the platform. Structured, section-by-section questionnaires mapped directly to Annex IV (high-risk technical documentation) and Annex XI (GPAI model documentation). Every question exists because a regulation requires an answer.
- →Branching logic adapts the questionnaire to your risk tier and operator role
- →Collaborative section assignment routes each area to the right team member
- →Inline regulatory guidance at paragraph level, with Article and Annex references
- →Evidence attachment with SHA-256 hashing and PDF/A-3 embedding for submission
- →Auto-save and full version control with section-level diffing
Compliance Gap Analysis
Gap analysis runs continuously against the full regulatory requirements matrix. It does not wait for you to submit a draft — it evaluates completeness in real time as your team works, flagging issues before they reach the approval stage.
- →Real-time compliance scoring as questionnaire sections are completed
- →Heat-map visualisation showing coverage across all Annex IV sections
- →Prioritised remediation guidance with regulatory references for each gap
- →Cross-AISDP consistency checking for provider/deployer documentation pairs
- →Automated re-evaluation triggered on reclassification or change submission
AI Regulatory Navigator
Describe your AI application in plain language. The Navigator uses retrieval-augmented generation over the full EU AI Act corpus to produce a preliminary scope and risk tier assessment — with inline citations to specific Articles, Annexes, and recitals. Every citation is validated against the corpus before it reaches you.
- →Conversational interface grounded entirely in the EU AI Act text
- →Two-stage citation validation — fabricated references are automatically suppressed
- →Non-binding advisory: clearly distinguished from the formal risk classification
- →Assessment exports to sprint-ready tasks in Jira, Trello, or Asana (v2.0)
- →Handoff to Risk Classification Engine with pre-populated fields
Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment
Article 27 requires deployers of high-risk AI systems to conduct a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment before deployment. The FRIA module guides deployers through this obligation with domain-specific templates, integrated schema analysis outputs, and a residual risk register.
- →Domain-specific risk templates for each Annex III use case category
- →Affected population mapping with demographic scope definition
- →Operational context inputs including complaint mechanism documentation
- →Integrates with schema analysis outputs to surface relevant data risks
- →Residual Risk Register with lifecycle tracking and review triggers
Certification Module
Formal internal certification before external submission. The certification module manages scopes, eligibility evaluation, digital signing, and an append-only certification ledger. The EU Declaration of Conformity (Annex V) is generated through a structured Article 47 wizard with notified body workflow support.
- →Digital signature integration for all certification actions
- →Append-only certification ledger — no modification, no erasure
- →EU Declaration of Conformity wizard (Annex V, Article 47)
- →Notified body conformity assessment workflow for Annex III categories requiring third-party assessment
- →Submission Package generator: signed ZIP archive with evidence bundle and manifest
Post-Market Monitoring
Compliance does not end at certification. Article 72 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to maintain a post-market monitoring system throughout the system's lifecycle. Standard Intelligence operationalises this obligation with monitoring plans, incident tracking, and automated review triggers.
- →Structured Article 72 monitoring plan documentation within the AISDP
- →Incident recording and tracking aligned to Article 73 reporting obligations
- →External monitoring data ingestion via API: model performance, data drift, operational metrics
- →Configurable threshold alerting with automated AISDP review triggers on breach
- →Article 12 structured log ingestion endpoint for operational event records
Integrations
Standard Intelligence connects to the tools your teams already use, so compliance work lives alongside engineering sprints and HR workflows rather than in a separate silo. All integrations are configured per tenant with multiple simultaneous connections supported.
- →Jira, Trello, and Asana compliance task export — every obligation becomes a sprint task
- →Canvas LMS full integration for AI literacy curriculum delivery and Gradebook sync
- →External monitoring data API for model performance, drift, and operational metrics
- →SAML 2.0 and OIDC SSO at all subscription tiers
- →SCIM 2.0 directory synchronisation for automated user provisioning (Enterprise)
Every screen maps to a regulation.
See every module
in your environment.
Request access and provision a full trial tenant in under 60 seconds. Bring your first AI system documentation pack and see the platform work with your real use cases.